BLOG OF THE DAY
EDITOR'S PICKS
NEWS
Australia 'is a great cruise destination'
Japanese Knotweed problem to be 'tackled' by bug
Government announces plans to phase out peat-based compost
|
|
|
Forgotten your password? | |||||||
BLOG OF THE DAY
EDITOR'S PICKS
NEWS
Australia 'is a great cruise destination'
Japanese Knotweed problem to be 'tackled' by bug
Government announces plans to phase out peat-based compost
OFT 'not allowed' set bank charges
25/11/2009
A two year legal battle over bank charges today ended as the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) lost in a case against eight UK high street banks.The OFT was campaigning for refunds for customers who it considers to have been overcharged by banks after falling into an unauthorised overdraft. Defying earlier verdicts from the High Court and Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court ruled that the consumer body had no right to fully gauge the fairness of charges. Martin Bamford, chartered financial planner for Informed Choice, expressed surprise at the decision: "Before the ruling, the general view was that the verdict would be in the favour of the Office of Fair Trading." However, Mr Bamford added: "A verdict ruling against the banks could have had big consequences in terms of their financial strength, future profitability and also the relationship we all have with banking services." It is believed that around £20 billion could have been reclaimed by customers if the decision had ruled in favour of the OFT. The Supreme Court said overdraft charges constituted part of the procedure of remuneration for the collection of services banks offer their current account holders. Get a free equity release guide and find out how you can get some additional income. Posted by Jez Walters ![]() |
Related Finance News